Our public officials and law enforcement personnel face constant risks both to their lives and their privacy in today’s digital world. Learn about recent efforts to safeguard their information and how tools like the Incognito Browser can offer enhanced online protection.
Revealed in this exclusive report:
– Daniel’s Law: How the legislation seeks to protect public officials and the flaws still present in the system.
– Data Brokers Under Fire: Learn about the class-action lawsuit against LexisNexis by thousands of law enforcement officers.
– The Bigger Picture: Understand the influence data brokers have on everyday Americans’ lives.
– National Security Implications: Explore how unsecured data can be a threat to national security.
– Protect Your Privacy: Discover how tools like Incognito Browser provide robust privacy protection for everyone.
—
In today’s hyper-connected world, the privacy of our public servants — from law enforcement to judges — is increasingly under threat. Across New Jersey and beyond, these individuals are risking both their privacy and their lives to serve the community. Congress and other governing bodies must take immediate steps to ensure these brave men and women can perform their duties without compromising their personal safety.
New Jersey got a stark reminder of this need back in 2020 when 20-year-old Daniel Anderl was tragically killed. Daniel’s murderer had targeted Judge Esther Salas, his mother, by locating her address through publicly accessible information. This horrific event underscored the vulnerabilities that come with public service, leading New Jersey to enact “Daniel’s Law.” The law aims to veil sensitive data of public officials and their families from open access, targeting third-party data brokers who profit from selling such personal details.
However, fast forward four years, and it seems Daniel’s Law isn’t holding up as intended. Recently, more than 18,000 New Jersey law enforcement officers filed a class-action lawsuit against LexisNexis Risk Data Management. The officers allege that LexisNexis retaliated against them for removing their personal information, as permitted by Daniel’s Law. The data management giant reportedly froze their credit, mistakenly labeling them as identity theft victims, causing significant harm to their credit histories.
This lawsuit highlights a crucial issue: the overwhelming influence data brokers hold over American consumers’ lives. These brokers not only shape individuals’ credit histories but also affect their access to various essential services like insurance, mortgages, and healthcare. For those who choose to opt-out of data sharing—like our vigilant law enforcement—you face considerable risks if things go awry. Their limited recourse is resorting to court systems, which are neither swift nor cost-effective. Clearly, stricter regulations are necessary to protect consumers’ privacy while ensuring fair legal processes.
Data brokers don’t merely impact everyday citizens; they also have deep ties with federal entities and private sectors. LexisNexis, for example, holds a hefty $34 million contract with the federal government for identity verification purposes via Login.gov — a single sign-on service providing access to numerous state and federal services. Worse still, LexisNexis has been identified as selling consumer driving data to insurers without consent. This practice enables insurers to impose higher rates based on personalized data points like braking habits and travel patterns. Because of these wide-ranging interests, tracking and holding such brokers accountable becomes exceedingly challenging.
Privacy should never be compromised for any individual, especially those in public service roles. National security adviser Jake Sullivan recently pointed out that opponents view Big Data as a strategic asset ripe for exploitation. Data brokers inadvertently create loopholes for adversaries by leaving personal data exposed.
A poignant study from Duke University revealed that anyone could purchase sensitive information about active military service members — including names, home addresses, emails, and cell phone numbers. Even more alarming is that some cases implicated vendors like LexisNexis in selling this information to foreign adversaries.
Given these glaring threats, it’s clear that action is needed to shield American citizens’ data from both domestic misuse and international threats. President Joe Biden recently issued an Executive Order geared towards safeguarding Americans’ sensitive data from being sold abroad. Within Congress, we must seek robust protective measures around data handling practices.
Yet legislation alone isn’t enough; practical tools are also necessary for ensuring individual privacy online. This is where solutions like the Incognito Browser become invaluable by offering superior incognito mode features that surpass those of traditional browsers.
While mainstream browsers may offer basic private browsing options that still allow cookies and other tracking methods through loopholes–the Incognito Browser guarantees stronger measures against tracking and digital fingerprinting through its Agent Cloaking technology enhancing anonymity levels significantly better than typical incognito modes can deliver.
Service shouldn’t come at the price of compromised privacy or safety. Robust solutions both legislative—and technological like Incognito Browser—are pivotal in enacting comprehensive protection strategies ensuring everyone’s right to private life unperturbed amidst an increasingly invasive digital landscape.
To bolster your own online security alongside shared societal safeguards being discussed today across governing platforms consider arming yourself digitally too—begin exploring safer browsing avenues made possible uniquely via specialized applications such as Incognito Browser available now on Android devices promoting seamless private interactions across your web engagements without unwanted prying eyes tracking every virtual step taken.
